The Pros
There are advantages to both schools of thought. For those that preach technique, players are more likely to develop good habits while avoiding bad habits. Although it may take more time for the player's skills to develop initially, they won't have to relearn the proper catching technique later in life.
For those that give precedence to success, coaches are likely creating a more enjoyable environment in present-day situations. A player who uses their body to catch a pass during a live-game situation gets to experience immediate success and arguably get more joy out of playing at a younger age.
The Cons
Likewise, both philosophies also have their disadvantages. For technique-driven instruction, some athletes may become frustrated and discouraged from sticking with a sport. If young athletes find instruction too difficult, they may be more inclined to invest their time in other activities. Encouragement and communication with the athlete is key to the success of this coaching philosophy to make sure they understand the importance of proper technique to long-term success.
For success-driven instruction, coaches and parents may feel as if the utility of learned behavior is limited. If young athletes take to a sport but aren't practicing and developing proper skills, they may fall behind peer athletes who received better training and instruction from an early age. Recognition of the athlete's physical development is key to the long-term success of this short-term strategy. Make sure they're learning proper technique as their abilities increase so they don't become too reliant on old habits.
In the end, coaches and parents need to keep an open mind when it comes to youth sports instruction. Decisions about coaching and instruction should be made on a case-by-case basis that focuses solely on the best interests of each individual youth athlete.
Find activities for kids near you.
- 2
- of
- 2
Discuss This Article